The Hindu Caste System

In the dictionary used by Google Assistant, caste (pronouced kast), is a system “distinguished by relative degrees of ritual purity or pollution and of social status.” During British reign over the Indian subcontinent from 1876 to 1947, the practice was outlawed.

The caste system, though against the law, still holds many people down in poorer parts or religious strongholds of Hindu Society.

This wasn’t always the case. Hindu religious scriptures, a group of writings collectively called the Vedas, broadly and variously define caste not by social status but by natural proclivity. Religious scholars in the field say we’re all divided into four categories. Not just Hindus, but all of humanity.

The four castes are:

  1. The laborer.
  2. The businessman
  3. The politician and organizer
  4. The thoughtful person.
The Indian subcontinent, is a large peninsula that protrudes from southern Asia. It comprises of several countries, India being the most prominent.

These divisions are called: Shudra, Vaishya, Kshatriya and Brahmin and you’ve just had your first lesson in Sanskrit for the day. Sanskrit is similar to Latin in that the language exists and scriptures are written in the language, but it’s not a spoken language anymore.

Originally, culturally and historically, caste was not determined by birth or social status but by natural propensity. Thus if someone born in a laborer family had a proclivity to be a politician, or businessman, or priest, and earned the qualifications through apprenticeship, then so be it.

In fact, one Indian guru, A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, traveled to the United States in the early nineteen sixties. By teaching and initiating disciples among young Americans, he created a class of Brahmins from ordinary people that gravitated to his religion called Krishna Consciousness. This relatively small religion migrated around the world and still has followers to this day.

Swami Prabhupada founded the Hare Krishna religion in the West

That Prabhupada would introduce ancient Indian teachings in the United States clearly suggests that in the mind of some Hindus caste is not by birth, but by born proclivity. Anyone, Prabhupada believed, could become any member of a cast simply by exhibiting a tendency and learning about the religious beliefs behind it all.

Though compared to most religions the Hare Krishnas remain small in number, they are respected in various communities in India, but not by all. An example of a community that does not accept non-Hindu born people as Hindu-converts is the city of Jagannath Puri on the East coast of the Indian sub-continent. There is a big temple, much like the central church of a religion in the West. This is the Temple of Jagannath and is visited by Hindus who make the pilgrimage from all over the world to see it. The temple authorities, however, don’t allow anyone who was not born a Hindu to set foot in the temple. It is strictly enforced by multiple levels of security. “White Hindus” (or any other color of non-born Hindus) are not allowed to defile the temple. Even an Indian born Muslim is not allowed in the temple. You must be born in a Hindu family to be allowed inside.

The popular temple of Jagannath in Puri, India. Non-Hindus are not allowed inside.

It is tantamount to someone born in an Islamic family who converts to Christianity, and not allowed in the church because of his or her birth. Even though most Christian communities would accept an Islamic-convert, there are people and groups who are racially tainted toward anyone who has non-white skin. According to people of this mindset, everyone from Europe or the middle-east, with non-white skin must be a terrorist. Often Hindus and Sikhs are mistaken as Muslims and experience discrimination based on perception.

Never mind that in India and most other Asian countires there are Chrisitians, Jews, Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Buddhists and just about every other religion you can think of. The ignorance has become so deep, even in the wake of the age of the Internet, that many people don’t even know there are other religions like Sikhs and Buddhists and Hindus. You’ve even got a United States President who vehemently and relentlessly tries to stop people from entering the United States from countries that are predominately Muslim.

Image result for map of fiji
The island nation of Fiji. Photo from Ezilon Maps


Therefore, we can see that racism and prejudice exist among different cultures around the world. For example, I once visited Fiji, an island nation in the South Pacific. The indigenous population are predominately dark skinned. However, the British had a tendency to muck things up and so brought indentured laborers from India to help with the production of sugarcane, which grows like weeds over there.

As a result, fast forward a couple hundred years, the population of Fiji is split down the middle. You’ve got half the country native Fijians, and then you’ve got the Hindus, descendants of the Indians who were brought there by the British. They comprise the other half. They don’t like each other. There’s a lot of tension and mistrust on both sides. Sometimes they have coops if the wrong side gets elected to lead the country. Sometimes there’s murder.

Getting back to the original assertion of this article, regardless of prejudices of people of the world, every culture has something to offer. There is nothing wrong with unity and diversity.

One of things I’ve taken away from the Indian culture, besides their wonderful knowledge of spices in cooking, is that the caste system was an unfair division of society if taken because of birth or placement of one’s family, but that also there is a recognition that everyone is different, not equal. Someone wants to be a priest. Someone wants to be a businessman. Someone wants to be a politician, or a policeman, or a military person. Someone likes to dig in the ground, build houses, build skyscrapers.

These are the four castes. It’s going on all over the world anyway, whether we call it that or not.

Why not recognize this in children as they grow up? Why don’t we start helping, directing, encourage kids if we see, “Oh, he/she likes woodworking. Oh, he/she likes working on cars. Oh, he/she likes physics! He/she likes bodybuilding and sports!”Image result for making a table

Obviously, the American system of education is not doing nearly as well as some other countries, despite propaganda from politicians.

Perhaps, long before they reach college age, young men and women should have the training they need to step out into life and become a productive member of society that has a job doing stuff they like!

Below is a chart originally published in the British newspaper The Guardian. According to the data, and contrary to what American politicians might have you believe, the United States is not a leader in education by any means whatsoever. Is it time to try something else? If not the caste system, then at least something different!

Data summary

World education ranking

This data is sorted by Readings score. It could be sorted otherwise, just this is the way this data is sorted. You will see the United States is way down the list.

Country Name
Reading score
Maths score
Science score
OECD average 493 496 501
Shanghai-China 556 600 575
Korea-South 539 546 538
Finland 536 541 554
Hong Kong-China 533 555 549
Singapore 526 562 542
Canada 524 527 529
New Zealand 521 519 532
Japan 520 529 539
Australia 515 514 527
Netherlands 508 526 522
Belgium 506 515 507
Norway 503 498 500
Estonia 501 512 528
Switzerland 501 534 517
Poland 500 495 508
Iceland 500 507 496
United States 500 487 502
Liechtenstein 499 536 520
Sweden 497 494 495
Germany 497 513 520
Ireland 496 487 508
France 496 497 498
Chinese Taipei 495 543 520
Denmark 495 503 499
United Kingdom 494 492 514
Hungary 494 490 503
Portugal 489 487 493
Macao-China 487 525 511
Italy 486 483 489
Latvia 484 482 494
Slovenia 483 501 512
Greece 483 466 470
Spain 481 483 488
Czech Republic 478 493 500
Slovak Republic 477 497 490
Croatia 476 460 486
Israel 474 447 455
Luxembourg 472 489 484
Austria 470 496 494
Lithuania 468 477 491
Turkey 464 445 454
United Arab Emirates 459 453 466
Russian Federation 459 468 478
Chile 449 421 447
Serbia 442 442 443
Bulgaria 429 428 439
Uruguay 426 427 427
Mexico 425 419 416
Romania 424 427 428
Thailand 421 419 425
Trinidad and Tobago 416 414 410
Colombia 413 381 402
Brazil 412 386 405
Montenegro 408 403 401
Jordan 405 387 415
Tunisia 404 371 401
Indonesia 402 371 383
Argentina 398 388 401
Kazakhstan 390 405 400
Albania 385 377 391
Qatar 372 368 379
Panama 371 360 376
Peru 370 365 369
Azerbaijan 362 431 373
Kyrgyzstan 314 331 330

Space Shuttle and the Horses Ass

Did you know…. The gauge for the U.S. railways is 4 feet eight and a half inches. That’s a weird number. It also, as we shall see, has relevance to the now retired U.S. Space Shuttle program and the horses ass. This post was copied from a Facebook page.

Image may contain: outdoor

Why was that railway gauge used for train tracks in America? Well, because that‘s the way they built them in England, and English engineers designed the first US railroads.

Why did the English build them like that?
Because the first rail lines were built by the same people who built the wagon tramways, and that’s the gauge they used.

So, why did ‘they’ use that gauge then?
Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they had used for building wagons, which used that same wheel spacing.

Why did the wagons have that particular odd wheel spacing?
Well, if they tried to use any other spacing, the wagon wheels would break more often on some of the old, long distance roads in England . You see, that’s the spacing of the wheel ruts.

So who built those old rutted roads?
Imperial Rome built the first long distance roads in Europe (including England ) for their legions. Those roads have been used ever since.

And what about the ruts in the roads?
Roman war chariots formed the initial ruts, which everyone else had to match or run the risk of destroying their wagon wheels. Since the chariots were made for Imperial Rome , they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing. Therefore the United States standard railroad gauge of 4 feet, 8.5 inches is derived from the original specifications for an Imperial Roman war chariot. Bureaucracies live forever.

So the next time you are handed a specification/procedure/process and wonder ‘What horse’s ass came up with this?’, you may be exactly right. Imperial Roman army chariots were made just wide enough to accommodate the rear ends of two war horses. (Two horses’ asses.)

Now, the twist to the story:

When you see a Space Shuttle sitting on its launch pad, there are two big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main fuel tank. These are solid rocket boosters, or SRBs. The SRBs are made by Thiokol at their factory in Utah . The engineers who designed the SRBs would have preferred to make them a bit fatter, but the SRBs had to be shipped by train from the factory to the launch site. The railroad line from the factory happens to run through a tunnel in the mountains, and the SRBs had to fit through that tunnel. The tunnel is slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad track, as you now know, is about as wide as two horses’ behinds.

So, a major Space Shuttle design feature, of what is arguably the world’s most advanced transportation system, was determined over two thousand years ago by the width of a horse’s ass. And you thought being a horse’s ass wasn’t important? Ancient horse’s asses control almost everything and….

CURRENT Horses Asses are controlling everything else.

The US standard railroad gauge (distance between the rails) is 4 feet, 8.5 inches. That’s an exceedingly odd number.

Relics of the Past Destroyed? Is it Islamic Extremists Again?

Back when the Taliban Government under Sudam Hussein was destroying relics and statues of Buddha in Afghanistan that were thousands of years old, historians were horrified. Could you imagine, for example, blowing up the pyramids of Egypt? The Taliban’s actions were reminiscent of the Nazi’s burning books, or of the Spanish burning all of the Mayan civilization books and with it their history.

Although the war between the North and the South was largely about slavery – owning people – it is still part of our history. It may not be the brightest point of our history, much, I suppose, like the Taliban saw their country’s roots in Buddhism and Hinduism (Afghanistan is a word coming from India’s Sanskrit language). They destroyed statues, figures, relics, historical monuments and every remnant of the past that they could get their hands on. Should we do the same, or should we see the bigger historical perspective?

Is it okay to have statues of important figures in the Confederate States of America? They went to war against the United States much like the thirteen colonies declared independence against the King of Britain and wrote the Declaration of Independence. The outcome of the two wars was different, but both were states fighting for independence.

Had the colonies lost their war and America stayed part of the British Empire, would we now be destroying the Declaration of Independence and all evidence of the revolutionary war? Probably not. It would be history nonetheless. Similarly, should we now destroy all evidence there was a war – our deadliest war – now that there is no more a Confederate States of America?

These symbols – the Confederate heroes statues and flag – are seen not just as reminders of our unfortunate past of slavery but in today’s climate as a line drawn by white racists against the rest of us.

Admittedly, the issues are boiling over.

Once again racism rears its ugly head. We see the revival of the KKK and an alt-right president who comes just after the first African American president. The country could not be more divided – except perhaps in civil war.

Historically, we’re in a time of extreme pendulum swinging from left (Clinton) to right (George W.)  to left (Obama) to alt-right (Trump). The swinging is getting wider and wider and different views seem irreconcilable.

Despite the troubled times of the present, would the destruction or removal of these statues be met with blessings from historians four hundred years in the future, or will they see it in the same light as destruction of the Mayans, blowing up of Buddha statues or burning of books?

People will do what people do and this article will not change history in any significant way, however it’s one liberal’s opinion.

Can it be reasonably expected that Earth will survive, regressing to its original state, surviving the human race?

For the first half of Earth’s existence there was hardly any breathable oxygen. There was no life. In the end, Earth will return to a state where there is no life.

So, yes, Earth will out-survive humans, and yes, it may and will return to a state where no living thing can survive on it.

Sooner or later, maybe a billion years from now, the sun will become a red giant. All life on Earth will have ended by then.

Did Amelia Earhart Survive? No.

According to an article in NPR, the recent flurry in the news that Amelia Earhart survived a 1937 plain crash does not match historical records and is an incorrect assumption.

An undated photo in the U.S. National Archives ignited speculation that Amelia Earhart survived a 1937 crash, but the same photo appears in a book published two years before Earhart disappeared.

“A Japanese military history buff has found library records showing a photo supposedly depicting Amelia Earhart survived a crash landing in 1937 was actually published two years before the famous aviator vanished,” so says the NPR article. The photo was the basis of a History Channel show suggesting that Earhart had survived the crash.

Amelia Earhart set out to be the first woman to fly around the world in 1937. Her flight went down somewhere in Asia and she was never heard from again. The mystery of what happened to her remains to this day. It had previously been assumed she crashed and died, but a show on the History Channel challenges that conclusion based on a photograph. In the photo, a woman with her back to the camera is said to be Amelia Earhart.

However, a Japanese blogger has found the same photo featured in the History Channel series was actually taken in 1935, two years earlier, a fact not mentioned in the TV show.

It appears we still don’t know exactly what happened to Amelia, but she wasn’t captured by the Japanese.